Monthly Archives: June 2024

Poppy by Joseph Minden (Carcanet)

Poppy by Joseph Minden (Carcanet)

With its ‘white teeth’ and red ‘tongues’, the poppy speaks of the British war dead; for over a century it’s been this country’s prime symbol of commemorative remembrance. It’s regarded as apposite for this role because of its commonness (as in ‘the common soldier’), its colour (blood), its analgesic properties (healing), and its yearly re-appearance (anniversary, renewal) in the former WW1 battlefields and war-cemeteries of Northern France and Belgium.

The principal narrative in this book describes its narrator’s car tour to these ‘squat’, ‘cinematic’ graveyards. He walks around ‘aimlessly above the/ body parts’. He notes the ‘forgotten’ Picardy bleuets which are the French commemorative flower, the ‘crisp lettering’ of the ‘luminous’ graves, and the other ‘pre-dead’ visitors. He finds a German polyandrium and the headstones of deserters (‘SHOT AT DAWN/ […]/ A WORTHY SON/ OF HIS FATHER’) and of Chinese Labour Corps recruits. He contrasts the circular layouts of neolithic monuments with these gravestones and poppies ‘stretched out, row on row’, as if the dead soldiers are eternally on parade. He asks: ‘[w]hat should we make of the fallen?’

But the poppy is a pharmakon, an unstable signifier, as the post-structuralists used to say. It might be an even more apposite symbol, this poet suggests provocatively, for the nineteenth-century Opium Wars fought by Britain to force China to import the drug. Except that those massacres in the cause of free-trade substance-abuse go strangely unmemorialised in Britain. In China, we’re told, they are far from forgotten, so that it’s offensive for British officials there to wear a poppy – but, of course, they do anyway. 

In its scrutiny of these and related topics, this first collection deploys many forms and genres: syllabics, common measure, Mark Doty-style tercets with stepped indents, journal-, travel- and dream-poems, lots of short-sentence note-form, a deft sonnet sequence containing some great rhymes (veranda-propaganda-philander-‘and a’ was a first to me), and a sequence called ‘Headstones’ shaped as tall, narrow, full-justified blocks. Similes are used to make thematic links (‘dawn came like stone’) and subsidiary characters treated functionally. ‘Jason’ provides meta-commentary (‘Memories […] only yield themselves’). ‘Mina’, the featureless ex, seems to represent loss. The family-history characters and elements (Romania, WW2, Cambridgeshire) felt less well-folded into the titular theme, other than via top-level abstractions like ‘memory’ or ‘war’ or ‘inheritance/ heritage’.

The book oscillates too round its title’s sense as ‘pop-py’, as ‘popular’. Very familiar bits English history and literature (Harold at Hastings, Sherlock Holmes, ‘The Listeners’) interknit with Geoffrey Hill, ‘The Wanderer’ and obscurer heritage sites. The difficult opening poem acts rather like a Horatian arceo. Then again, there are a good few immediately welcoming poems enjoyable for their straightforward bathos and surprise:

            Watching a drunk Brit
            with Lest We Forget
            stitched into the sleeve
            of his polo shirt
            stumble around and burble
            at the Menin Gate
            in Ypres
            for the last post,
            Jason said
            *
            I forget what he said.

It’s nonetheless one of those collections that requires you frequently to assemble meaning by searching out things well beyond general knowledge: Lin Zexu? Ferienort? Mamaliga? Lebuh Chulia? This increasingly adopted style of Internet Modernism implies not so much a doctus lector as a docked one, in which a poem’s lean brevity is achieved via digital outsourcing, leaving its initial impression one of lacunate intertextual links, and whose first-base success resides in generating enough curiosity for the smartphone-enabled reader willingly to follow them. A writer as self-aware as Joseph Minden signals all this not just by puns around ‘re-membering’ (or ‘re-fusing’) the dismembered, but also by referencing Carlo Ginzburg’s notion of narrative as clue-following, as ‘hunters marking traces’. And no disapproval is intended here: the book finishes by delivering (what seemed to me) its best poem of all – ‘Conditional’, a complex free verse tour-de-force tying up Kitchener, neolithic monuments, Dark Age Britain, a relationship, Kipling’s lapidary slogans, and the toppling of slave-owner statues. It makes an apt ending to an uncommonly memorable read.

Guy Russell 30th June 2024

1/, tests by Luke Emmett (Litter Press)

1/, tests by Luke Emmett (Litter Press)

I’ve come across Luke Emmett’s poetry on the internet in small doses. This larger ‘small dose’ made up of 20 minimalist poems is an intriguing read. Each poem is discrete, puzzling, sonorous and yet demanding of an explanation which is (obviously) not forthcoming. Which is not to say that they are unsuccessful as poems because this is clearly not the case yet even with material which plays with obscurity and difficulty the reader (this reader in any cases) puzzles away at interpretation because the temptation is unavoidable. Now, to a few of the poems, not necessarily in chronological order:

          That Hobgoblin,

          he’s a real card isn’t he?

          What does he say?

          NOTHING IS FOREVER

This is in fact the final poem in the book and probably one of the most ‘coherent.’ The title runs into the following line and prompted me to check the meaning of ‘hobgoblin’ as I realised I wasn’t entirely sure of the derivation! Ah! Puck from a Midsummer Night’s Dream, of course and references to mischief and shape shifting are useful pointers. We could go into a history of folklore and pagan conflicts with Christianity here but best not. The point being that the intelligence being transmitted in these four short limes is of an ‘outsider’ nature and points towards serious jesting and philosophical puzzling. Which is what we seem to get in abundance with these poems where syntax and function is slightly skewed and where the sound aspect of the poetry (the way words jam up against each other) is as important as the semantic content. I find myself reading these pieces through quickly to get an overall feel then attempting to relate this ‘immediate grasp’ to a sense of conventional narrative construction. Which is completely mad, of course, but what you (I) instinctively attempt and I have to say that the process is both frustrating and very enjoyable. These poems remind me, to some extent of John Philips’ minimalist investigations. Here are a couple more to ‘get to grips with.’

          Rub

          Jacket on chair

          still there. I will

          wear it;

          it creaks.

          Buttons

          For short thread string to

          cloth, the button I’ve kept

          has three holes, shines.

          Continue to pick the loose 

          matter; I hope for visitors.

There’s a continuity here as both poems deal with items of clothing which take on a ‘life of their own’ as they are the key subjects of each piece. There’s a basic rhyme in the first piece, slightly humorous, there is a suggestion of the owner, the ‘I’ of the piece, and very little else. We may have ‘visitors’ in the second poem, a hint at isolation perhaps, a touch of melancholy, a note of ‘obsessional’ behaviour (‘pick the loose/matter’) the possibility of hope, yet each poem feels complete and somehow just right. I haven’t read any of Samuel Beckett’s poetry but I imagine it may have been a bit like this.

          Nightshade Hymns

           Bloody poison of milky red

           berry

                 shade

          toward sleep and move route,

          spit in basin, check image,

          has passion again, unfamiliar.

Here the reader can perhaps construct a narrative around the given information. We are probably talking about deadly nightshade (again I felt the need to consult google!) but this may be a diversion as the berries of the nightshade are black though they are apparently related by family to the tomato. The linking of ‘poison’ to ‘passion’ as much by sound and look as to meaning is indicative and the reference to sleep (death via shade?) again suggests something toxic and intoxicating! Yet ‘move route’ and ‘unfamiliar’ are more troubling though tempting at the same time. The point being I think, as I’ve suggested above, is that you have to take the entire poem as an entity and attempt to intuitively appreciate its whole without being bogged down with ‘meaning’ while yet being unable to completely avoid the search. I’m sure I’ve read a lot of ‘obscure’ poetry which doesn’t sing and somehow work on you and which you wish you’d never encountered but these pieces are successful though I’m not entirely sure why.

     Here’s a final poem to further whet your appetite, hopefully:

          Stuck

          Movement; a spasm

          of laughter accusing

          uncared. Taste

          pain to bodies, touch

          on coupled scissor,

          reddish, bent.

It’s the careful relation of the words to each other (accusing/uncared, for example) and the force of such minimalist phrasing which makes these pieces really shine. There’s a sense of disturbance and also isolation and of a possibly troubled mind but I don’t want to overplay this thought too much.

I could try out an overall critique based on what little I know about Luke Emmett but I’m not going to attempt that here. Suffice to say that I’m glad I encountered these short poems and was pleased to make some faltering attempts at interpretation and engagement. I enjoyed the experience.

Steve Spence 29th June 2024

Grief’s Alphabet by Carrie Etter (Seren Books)

Grief’s Alphabet by Carrie Etter (Seren Books)

I’m sceptical of most confessional poetry but Carrie Etter’s book of elegies for her mum is a tough, not-to-be-missed exploration of grief and loss. Although there is a titular poem using the A-Z, the book feels more like a response to what was a plan but soon proved impossible. We only get ‘Notes for A’ and a few other letters such as ‘W Is for Wedding’ and ‘M Is Usually Memory and Occasionally McDonalds’; more poignant perhaps is ‘F Is for Fuck This’, where the title is the complete poem, the poem the closing one of the second of three sections.

It gives an impression of reaching an impasses, the author resisting her own attempt to order her grieving responses which perhaps the writer in her had partly mapped out. Instead we get a wide range of voices, forms and stories which gradually reveal Etter’s past, relationships and loss.

‘Origin Story’, the first section, reveals Etter was adopted, was a sister, had teenage attitude, and tells stories about her Mum, her Dad and of a ‘Pregnant Teenager and her Mama’. Of graduation and travels to England before ‘The News’ arrives back home in the States:

     Crackling across the Atlantic
     my mother’s voice.
     She says ‘Your father,’
     and, as one, we fall.

In time, post coma and now a paraplegic, ‘father’ dies and we are gifted ‘The Last Photograph’ of Mrs. Etter before the poet returns to England. 

Later, or perhaps sooner (we are not told) Etter will have to face ‘The Brink’: her mother’s death, again across the ocean, along with the physical, mental and emotional reactions, most startlingly recorded in ‘The Body in Mourning’. Here, the poet has to endure ‘the daily waking to      mourning’ but also considers the bodily results of grieving:

     O leaky body      such water      such flood, mucus and

     mascara she’d forgotten      her charred cheeks in the mirror

and the body of the deceased:

     the body still, eyes open      a soundless, resounding no

     […]

     the body become stone, the breath       reluctant

     *

     and after years?     the body’s subtler flux

     amid the elements       an hour aflame      or drenched

     weight as mineral     deep in earth      or almost

     transparent, nearly air      thin linen pined to string

     adrift or aloft             depending on

After this open-ended poem, the second section of poems moves to ‘H Is for Hurtle, J Is for July’, a retrospective look back at coping. Then comes the F poem mentioned earlier, an assertion of self, of coping, of having to go on.

Having to go on, however, into the ‘Orphan Age’, the book’s final section. Loss, of course, cannot be simply swept aside; all too often – as I know from firsthand experience – small and often stupid things can trigger grief anew. But you can, and Etter does, take refuge in the everyday, be that snuggling up to a cat or baking and eating tuna casserole. Also the less everyday: Etter gives us a prose poem ‘W Is for Wedding’, acknowledging that her mother both ‘is and isn’t’ there but also content to ‘take a step, then another, toward joy.’

The rest of the book is mostly calm and lucid, philosophical even, with poems about endless birth and rebirth (‘Oroboros’), the memories brought up when playing crazy golf, and the completed alphabet of grief poem. But there is also a hint of mysticism: ‘Instructions for the Glimpse’, the invocation of a ‘Ghost’, and a moving final poem, ‘Reincarnation as Seed’, where a new plant is urged to ‘grow / grow toward light’ as the personification or representation of ‘my dear mother’, urged to ‘bask’ in the sunshine.

Writing poems about death and grieving is an almost impossible task but Etter has managed to carefully walk the tightrope between mawkishness, confession and bewilderment. Her words combine vulnerability and emotion with a writerly detachment, seeing anew and documenting the struggle with ‘not falling face first into woe.’ This is brave, powerful, moving poetry that has clearly been fought for every step of the way.

Rupert Loydell 10th June 2024